The real problem is of forgetfulness of the true self. The memory we have is an objective memory, it really doesn't know who it is or what it is. And the true self is so transient that it takes this divine form, it is, it is, it is, and it just is. The divine is experiencing, all of it is. Realization is for the intellect, everything is continuous experience, this minds only thinks of experience as which, which differs, the duality, because that is different from it, thus it was an experience that this had. All of this sounds abstract because it really is about realization and not conceptualization, the water is cold, its a realization through experience, its not a conception that the water is cold when you dip your hand in it, had it been a concept it would have been described as the skin as thermo receptor coming in contact to an element in nature which has a slower molecular motion and thus the transfer of temperature is experienced. So who is it that says that the water is cold? Is it Abhishek? Who is Abhishek? I say that the water is cold, and I am Abhishek. But you are saying I am "Abhishek", that means you are observing. So who is it who is observing? *silence* I don't have any word to describe, I the Ego, cannot describe who the I is, but because of it exists me and the things that I do, I see, taste, touch, smell, feel. It all exists in it. If a word could even try to depict what it is to feel like, it is "infinity" and therefore it is ever pervading and hence indistinguishable, non dual, it is.